Skip to content

Sim4Life

641 Topics 2.0k Posts

Subcategories


  • Installing Sim4Life and configuring licenses

    34 Topics
    117 Posts
    E

    Is there any dongle driver for ARM (aarch64) ?

  • Working with CAD models

    57 Topics
    193 Posts
    N

    Hi @bryn, I'm meshing an implanted device as a faceted mesh which is then embedded in an octree mesh. This is all through the Python API.

  • Working with models from the Virtual Population

    54 Topics
    256 Posts
    K

    Could you please explain how to modify the volumes of the bladder and rectum while simultaneously deforming the surrounding tissues? Additionally, I am unsure how to view tissue cross-sections. Since I am a beginner, I would greatly appreciate a detailed explanation.

    Thank you for your assistance.

  • FDTD, Low-Frequency, Neuron, Mode-Matching, Flow, Acoustics, etc...

    233 Topics
    690 Posts
    C

    Hi all! I use the following very simple structure to test whether I am using the LF Ohmic Quasi-Static Solver correctly. The voltage comes out as expected but the current (density) is incorrect. I have these three electrodes of the same radius (1mm) stacking together (touching each other) in an electrode-cylinder-electrode configuration. I want to apply to a 2V (+1V top, -1V bottom) to the two silver electrodes and achieve a 1 kA current through. So I chose the cylinder material (copper) and length such that the resistance is 2 mOhm.

    After running the simulation, where I place a line as voltage sensor (it runs from 2mm offset from the top electrode to 2mm offset from the bottom electrode, in the centre), it gives a value of -1.9786V as expected.
    When I combine the J(x,y,z,f0) from the overall field and a plane I created and use flux evaluator to measure total current density as described here https://forum.zmt.swiss/topic/24/compute-the-total-current-flowing-between-two-electrodes-in-an-electro-quasistatic-lf-simulation, unexpected resutls occur. I tried two different planes and they gave different results::

    A block with 0mm thickness and 1m x 1m in area in the middle of the cylinder parallel to the electrodes, result: 1 A/m^2, multiply by the area gives 1A A cylinder with 0mm thickness and 1mm in radius in the middle of the cylinder parallel to the elctrodes, resutls: 49.7369 A/m^2, multiply by the area gives 0.156mA
    (P.S. why the current density has a unit of [A/m^2 m^2]?)

    Model, Simulation and Analysis details are summaried in the screenshots attached. IMG_5162.jpg IMG_5163.jpg IMG_5164.jpg Screenshot 2025-01-12 at 21.26.50.jpg Screenshot 2025-01-12 at 21.27.16.jpg Screenshot 2025-01-12 at 21.27.32.jpg Screenshot 2025-01-12 at 21.31.17.jpg Screenshot 2025-01-12 at 21.34.49.jpg Screenshot 2025-01-12 at 21.35.28.jpg

  • Postprocessing results

    104 Topics
    301 Posts
    G

    Hello, I'm performing simulation on head models reconstructed from MRI scans and I integrate the white matter anisotropy obtained from DTI as shown in the jupiter notebook tutorial. I'm interested in extracting electric field in small boxes, is there a way to extract also FA and eigen vector in just those boxes?

  • Scripting interface for Sim4Life

    126 Topics
    371 Posts
    L

    As far as I'm aware it is not possible to suppress those messages. Maybe try writing your customized messages into a log file instead?

  • Running Sim4Life over a network

    4 Topics
    7 Posts
    ofliO

    Hi,
    Please allow me to share here the response we sent you via the Sim4Life support email so that other users can benefit from your questions. The default machine provides 500GB of storage, and you are running out of space for this project. If your results require more than 500GB, consider upgrading to a higher-tier machine with greater storage capacity. Alternatively, you could reduce the size of your simulation project by splitting it into multiple smaller simulations. This would allow you to continue using the default tier. Additionally, you might optimize your sensor settings, such as by creating smaller sensors and recording data for specific volumes of interest, rather than using an Overall Field sensor.

  • S4L is unable to read and load my project

    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    2k Views
    ali.oezenA

    THank you very much for the hints.

  • How to export images from Sim4Life Analysis Results

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    M

    That works! If it's for a 2D plot, you can always right click and export the data to an excel or csv file and then work with that if you'd prefer

  • Optimal performance

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    534 Views
    SylvainS

    The full version has the same performance as the Light version: it can just deal with bigger problems.
    Note that the low-frequency solvers are not GPU-accelerated, so if you are using that the GPU is anyway not used. If you are using the FDTD solver instead, it is accelerated by the GPU but its performance might be severely affected by the frequency of your simulation (the lower the frequency, the more iteration the FDTD method has to do in order to reach convergence). If you are in a regime where the quasi-static approximations hold, I would strongly advise you to use the LF solvers.

  • Editing the excitation signal

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    417 Views
    SylvainS

    I think your signal was fine, but your settings for the Field Sensor need to be changed.

  • Invalid Bounding Box Error

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    408 Views
    SylvainS

    2kHz will probably not be feasible in most propagating media, because the wavelength will simply be too large compared to the grid resolution your geometry requires (leading to unreasonably large time steps).
    You might want to check for e.g. what your grid look like, especially the padding at the boundaries of your computational domain.

  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • CEM43 / Arrhenius Thermal Damage

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    267 Views
    No one has replied
  • how to model a bent wire with a fixed length?

    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    S

    Thanks for the code.

    Actually I need to model some wires with the fixed length, with one part in the brain in different spots and the remaining out of the brain, It takes a long time to model each one and I'm looking for a way to make them in a shorter time.

    Thanks.

  • grid resolution of wire and insulation

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    614 Views
    S

    Thanks for your reply.