Skip to content

Sim4Life

721 Topics 2.3k Posts

Subcategories


  • Installing Sim4Life and configuring licenses

    36 126
    36 Topics
    126 Posts
    D
    Thank you so much!
  • Working with CAD models

    63 225
    63 Topics
    225 Posts
    brynB
    preview (still working on the distance from e.g. F7 to F9) [image: 1757340222351-c2ee64b1-55df-41d6-9583-bd5832ceb962-image.png]
  • Working with models from the Virtual Population

    60 282
    60 Topics
    282 Posts
    T
    hi,bryn. Upon discovering your post, I downloaded the latest software version—9.2.1.19976. However, I was unable to locate the H. Personalised Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator. Might you kindly advise where I might find this?@bryn
  • FDTD, Low-Frequency, Neuron, Mode-Matching, Flow, Acoustics, etc...

    260 784
    260 Topics
    784 Posts
    C
    When you provide multiple EM-LF simulations as sources to the Neuron solver, the neuron effectively receives the sum of the extracellular fields/potentials generated by the individual simulations (assuming the same modulation pulse is used). This is expected behavior because EM-LF simulations are linear, and therefore their solutions can be superimposed. To verify this behavior, you can use the Field Combiner tool in Sim4Life: First, combine the EM-LF results using the Field Combiner, which applies linear superposition of the fields. Then, use the combined field as a single source for the Neuron simulation. If you compare this setup to a Neuron simulation where the individual EM-LF results are used as separate sources (with the same modulation pulse), the neuron response will be identical. This confirms that, internally, the Neuron solver is operating on the sum of the fields from the different EM-LF simulations. If additional verification is desired, the EM-LF fields can also be interpolated along the neuron spline (for each simulation individually and for the Field Combiner result) to explicitly confirm that the combined field corresponds to the pointwise sum of the individual fields. Note: the field combiner expects the fields to be at the same frequency. If you would like more information about a specific application, or if you would like to share your project with us to receive more targeted feedback, please do not hesitate to contact us at s4l-support@zmt.swiss.
  • Postprocessing results

    123 375
    123 Topics
    375 Posts
    B
    Hi, there aren't any known issues with the Multiplier tool that would prevent you from scaling your field by any arbitrary value. Is it possible that in your script, you are using the same variable 'output1' for each case and as such are calculating the same value each time? If you are still having issues, could you share your project and script with the support team via s4l-support@zmt.swiss?
  • Scripting interface for Sim4Life

    140 437
    140 Topics
    437 Posts
    brynB
    This is nice. Thanks @Robin-Wydaeghe
  • Running Sim4Life over a network

    4 7
    4 Topics
    7 Posts
    ofliO
    Hi, Please allow me to share here the response we sent you via the Sim4Life support email so that other users can benefit from your questions. The default machine provides 500GB of storage, and you are running out of space for this project. If your results require more than 500GB, consider upgrading to a higher-tier machine with greater storage capacity. Alternatively, you could reduce the size of your simulation project by splitting it into multiple smaller simulations. This would allow you to continue using the default tier. Additionally, you might optimize your sensor settings, such as by creating smaller sensors and recording data for specific volumes of interest, rather than using an Overall Field sensor.
  • Bone identification using RF signals

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • The file I created with Sim4Life light cannot be opened.

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    brynB
    If you don't have a full version, i think (untested) you can still recover the model by importing the smash file in the modeling tab.
  • 'Point Sensor Tool' is not available

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    Sorry, don't have S4L with neuron available at the moment, but I looked at the tutorial and it seems to have changed. When you create the sensor settings can you try to drag and drop the axon to the sensor setting and then chose the section name? (That was the old way of doing it) Still, you should be able to run the simulation without a point sensor.. Sorry can't help more
  • Everytime I'm doing a too complex simulation the file is lost

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    L
    I am using Sim4Life 6.2.1.4972. It happened once when I've had put a high "maximum number of samples" in the time domain (200 I think) with the acoustic head tutorial that I changed a bit, by putting 2 transducers instead of 1. Another time it was weird because it happened with a SEFT targeting a square of skin, which was rather simple but it did crash again. My simulation was probably wrong in a way, but it didn't throw and error and just stopped. But now that I am applying @gbgbha advices, it is fine :) and thanks for the tip ! I'll try for the file that I lost
  • Why does TRP exceed input power(Antenna)?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    SylvainS
    The TRP is computed in a different way than the input power. Both ways are mathematically correct and would both be "exact" if there were no numerical errors. In any FDTD simulation, however, there are spatial (finite grid) or temporal (finite time step) discretization error. What you are seeing in this half-wave dipole example, is that those discretization errors are larger than the precision you would require to distinguish TRP from input power (because the radiation efficiency is very high in this case, there is almost no difference between TRP and input power). To solve this "problem", either you accept that the simulation results are accurate enough for your needs (the warning is a simple consistency check) or you increase the precision of the simulation. You can do so by increasing the grid resolution, the overall convergence level and the resolution of the far-field sensor. This will be computationally expensive, though. To help you understand, you could try to add some lossy media in your (coarse) simulation (e.g. place the dipole next to a phantom or any other dielectric). The simulation will not be more precise, but the numerical errors will be less "obvious" because they will be dwarfed by the losses occurring in the dielectric. The TRP will be lower than the input power and the warning will not be triggered. I hope this helps.
  • The effect of electromagnetic field on the temperature of human tissues

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    617 Views
    No one has replied
  • S4L is unable to read and load my project

    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    9k Views
    ali.oezenA
    THank you very much for the hints.
  • How to export images from Sim4Life Analysis Results

    image export png jpeg
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    M
    That works! If it's for a 2D plot, you can always right click and export the data to an excel or csv file and then work with that if you'd prefer
  • Optimal performance

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    SylvainS
    The full version has the same performance as the Light version: it can just deal with bigger problems. Note that the low-frequency solvers are not GPU-accelerated, so if you are using that the GPU is anyway not used. If you are using the FDTD solver instead, it is accelerated by the GPU but its performance might be severely affected by the frequency of your simulation (the lower the frequency, the more iteration the FDTD method has to do in order to reach convergence). If you are in a regime where the quasi-static approximations hold, I would strongly advise you to use the LF solvers.
  • Editing the excitation signal

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    SylvainS
    I think your signal was fine, but your settings for the Field Sensor need to be changed.
  • Invalid Bounding Box Error

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    922 Views
    SylvainS
    2kHz will probably not be feasible in most propagating media, because the wavelength will simply be too large compared to the grid resolution your geometry requires (leading to unreasonably large time steps). You might want to check for e.g. what your grid look like, especially the padding at the boundaries of your computational domain.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    No one has replied
  • CEM43 / Arrhenius Thermal Damage

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    520 Views
    No one has replied
  • how to model a bent wire with a fixed length?

    10
    1 Votes
    10 Posts
    4k Views
    S
    Thanks for the code. Actually I need to model some wires with the fixed length, with one part in the brain in different spots and the remaining out of the brain, It takes a long time to model each one and I'm looking for a way to make them in a shorter time. Thanks.
  • grid resolution of wire and insulation

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    S
    Thanks for your reply.