Skip to content

Analysis & Postprocessing

Postprocessing results

116 Topics 332 Posts
  • Extract EMLF Results via Jupyter

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    11 Views
    No one has replied
  • Normalization for precise current control via Jupyter

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4 Views
    No one has replied
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    38 Views
    No one has replied
  • 1 Votes
    18 Posts
    6k Views
    L
    Hi, sorry to bother you. Do you happen to know how to calculate the current absorbed by the electrodes and the impedance?
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    16 Views
    No one has replied
  • can't connect ports

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    44 Views
    M
    I ran the simulation again. This time it ran completely. Physical results the same but without any errors, i.e. the analysis section could indeed connect ports. So is there a random seed thing and a voxeling issue after all?
  • Text Exporter 'NaN' error

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    58 Views
    H
    Please select the overall field and select the E field, then look under "Field Data Tools". Please "Go to the HTML manual" from "Help" and search for NaN filter. I would recommend using the latest version of Sim4Life v9.0. [image: 1753361215835-bc62f2dd-580a-4b6b-b11d-728454d14416-sim4life_xhh8cgbkwm.png]
  • Advanced Masking of Fields

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    60 Views
    No one has replied
  • Simulation Combiner Channel Parameters

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    216 Views
    No one has replied
  • How do I export multiple MATLAB files together?

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    brynB
    You could probably export (XPostProcessor.VtkExporter or XPostProcessor.VtkXmlExporter, not sure it is in s4l_v1) it as a VTK file and modify your neural network DataLoader to support VTK files, e.g., via the meshio package or the much larger vtk package, or many others. Or you could write a little Python script to grab the field data and save it to npy. To access the field, you would get the output of the extractor or pipeline entity in the analysis, say a FloatFieldData object. It has a Field(self, index: int) -> np.ndarray method to get the field as a numpy array, which you could save using e.g., np.save("filename.npy", fd.Field(0))
  • Platform crashes

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    674 Views
    A
    Hi, Sorry to bother You. IN ATTACHED VIDEO SHOWS WHAT HAPPENS AFTER CLICKING THE OPTION "CREATE PLOT" AND THE SYSTEM CRASHES. The workstation and memory have been tested, all without errors. Can one of the service engineers help? Kind regards, Thank you, Andrei Andrei Churakov MD,PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Electronic Engineering and Technology BSUIR E-mail: anchurakov@bsuir.by
  • Fractional Anisotropy and Max Eigen vector from DTI

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    303 Views
    brynB
    This question is quite old. Maybe you found a solution? Otherwise I guess you could use one of these options: you can crop the field, e.g. via the bounding box (or the extent if you have an E-field on a rectilinear grid) you could use the interpolation filter: define your little box grids, and interpolate from the field sensor field to your box grids you could define small field sensors in the simulation setup (not sure it is scalable to hundreds of sensors)
  • MATCH returns switched values

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    463 Views
    ofliO
    Hi @parsley, Thank you for your feedback and for reporting the issue you experienced. The MATCH tool has already been successfully used/validated by many users and offers several useful features. For example, it allows users to add loading or matching circuits the S-matrix of a simulation and obtain updated scattering parameters without re‑running the full simulation. Have you experienced any problems with this particular workflow? From the information you provided, the issue appears to be related to only the Initial Matching function—the option that generates a matching circuit for a given S-matrix of a simulation at a chosen target frequency. In your case, you reported that it worked with the dipole antenna example but not with your specific antenna model. We would be happy to discuss the details so we can reproduce the problem and resolve it quickly. We will contact you to find out a convenient time to follow up. Thank you again for bringing this to our attention.
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3 Views
    No one has replied
  • This topic is deleted!

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    9 Views
    No one has replied
  • Normal vector to a tissue surface

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    312 Views
    H
    [image: 1736961843959-327c9ace-0099-4e59-b102-4a34c31e609c-sim4life_fxfwepw8sg.gif] to extract the inner normal vector to the cortical surface mask the field (set NaN outside GM) using the Mask Filter available under "Field Data Tools" in the top ribbion. add the Grey Matter Surface in the post-pro interpolate the (masked) field to the grey matter surface using the "Interpolator" which is active when the masked field and surface is selected. get the normal component via the NormalFieldEvaluator under the "Field Data Tools"
  • How do we put electrodes on the skin surface?

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    2k Views
    G
    @bryn @gc00 @halder Thank you so much, You've been very helpful !
  • Export large files to matlab

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    773 Views
    L
    @ofli Can the conductivity map after head segmentation be exported?
  • Problems when simulating antenna efficiency

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    338 Views
    SylvainS
    Hi, you can get additional information by enabling the "Far Field" sensor and then choosing the "Radiation Report" evaluator (see for example the Phased Array Patch Antenna tutorial). It will not solve your problem, but might help you get a clearer picture. From what you describe, it's possible you have a very low mismatch efficiency (most of the energy is reflected). This could be addressed by improving the way you are modeling your source, or by just ignoring it if it is not important (i.e. if you are not actually simulating the real feed and are only interested in the antenna itself). You would do that by considering the Radiation Efficiency (ratio of Radiated Power to Accepted Power) instead.
  • IsoSurface mesh

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    487 Views
    A
    Hello! Thank you for your quick answer :) I'll do that in the meantime