<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Can the core material have a B-H curve instead of fixed permeability?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">I’m a student at UPM (Madrid) and I’m starting a project on small TMS coils. Basically multi-layer helical coils wound on a ferrite core, and I want to look at the E-field they induce in a mouse or human head model.</p>
<p dir="auto">I found the thread about ferrous cores (post 1953) and the one about getting the inductance from the magnetic energy (post 65), which helped a lot. But there are a couple of things I couldn’t find anywhere:</p>
<p dir="auto">In the Magneto Static Vector Potential solver, is there a way to define the core with a nonlinear B-H curve (so it saturates), or does it only take a constant relative permeability? This is the main thing I need, since ferrite saturates.<br />
Is it possible to do the whole thing from Python (build the coil with the core, set up the vector potential + quasi-static simulations and get the E-field and the energy), or are some steps GUI-only?<br />
I also saw in post 1599 that a sweep didn’t work when the quasi-static solver took the vector potential results as input. Is that still the case? I’d like to sweep the current and the coil position.</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.zmt.swiss/topic/800/can-the-core-material-have-a-b-h-curve-instead-of-fixed-permeability</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 10:51:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.zmt.swiss/topic/800.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2026 17:37:41 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>